Cases 1 - 4 of 4
M. C. v. Dr. James Amrhein
as 13-2178
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M. C., a minor by and through his parents Pamela Crawford and John Mark Crawford, parental natural guardian Pamela Crawford, parental natural guardian John Mark Crawford
Defendant - Appellant:
DR. JAMES AMRHEIN
Defendant:
DR. IAN AARONSON, DR. YAW APPIAGYEI-DANKAH, KIM AYDLETTE and others
M. C. v. Dr. Ian Aaronson
as 13-2183
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M. C., a minor by and through his parents Pamela Crawford and John Mark Crawford, parental natural guardian Pamela Crawford, parental natural guardian John Mark Crawford
Defendant - Appellant:
DR. IAN AARONSON and DR. YAW APPIAGYEI-DANKAH
Defendant:
DR. JAMES AMRHEIN, KIM AYDLETTE, MEREDITH WILLIAMS and others
M. C. v. Kim Aydlette
as 13-2182
Plaintiff - Appellee:
M. C., a minor by and through his parents Pamela Crawford and John Mark Crawford, parental natural guardian Pamela Crawford, parental natural guardian John Mark Crawford
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM AYDLETTE, MEREDITH WILLIAMS, CANDICE DAVIS, a/k/a Candi Davis and others
Defendant:
DR. JAMES AMRHEIN, DR. IAN AARONSON, DR. YAW APPIAGYEI-DANKAH and others
Glenn Johnson, Jr., et al v. Jeremiah Nixon, et al
as 08-2984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Glenn W. Johnson, Jr. and Alton Louis Vaughn, Sr., also known as Bishop A. Louis Vaughn, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremiah (Jay) W. Nixon, In his Official Capacity as State of Missouri Attorney General, In his Capacity as Elected Official a representative of all citizens of the State of Missouri, In his Professional Capacity as State of Missouri Practicing Atty and i, State of Missouri Attorney General Office, In its Legal Capacity as State of Missouri Organization funded by the taxpayers of Missouri, Ronald James Carrier, In his Official Capacity as State of Missouri Assistant Attorney General, In his Professional Capacity as State of Missouri Practicing Attorney, also known as James Ronald Carrier and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
