Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 26 of 26
TRAUTMAN et al v. SEBELIUS et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00123
Plaintiff: DONALD W. TRAUTMAN , THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ERIE , ST. MARTIN CENTER, INC. and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, HILDA SOLIS, TIMOTHY GEITHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MOST REVEREND DAVID A. ZUBIK, BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH et al v. SEBELIUS et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00676
Plaintiff: MOST REVEREND DAVID A. ZUBIK, BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH , THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH , CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH, INC and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, HILDA SOLIS, TIMOTHY GEITHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PENNSYLVANIA WIRE AND CABLE COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
as 2:2012cv01020
Plaintiff: PENNSYLVANIA WIRE AND CABLE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00068
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
KAZAS et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00652
Plaintiff: ELIAS P. KAZAS and MARIA N. HNARAKIS-KAZAS
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Brosius v. Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2007cv00108
Plaintiff: Ellen Brosius
Defendant: Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?