Cases 1 - 10 of 19
(PS) Brown v. Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 2:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Richard Louis Brown
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs, David Stockwell, LaDonna R. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
(PS) Cheung v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2023cv01731
Plaintiff:
Michael Cheung
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01668
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Vargas-Rios v. Guild Mortgage Company et al
as 1:2019cv01592
Defendant:
Arbitration Award of Robert Presley of HMP Arbitration Association dated April 18, 2019, Jorge-Alberto Varagas-Rios, Department of Veteran Affairs-Loan Guaranty Service and Guild Mortgage Company
Plaintiff:
Jorge-Alberto Vargas-Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. Department of Veteran Affairs
as 2:2017cv01392
Plaintiff:
Clinton Ransom
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaighn et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv01602
Plaintiff:
Janis Kaighn and Gregory R. Kaighn
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Loretta H. Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Tevis et al v. California Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2015cv00972
Plaintiff:
Larry Tevis and Nancy Tevis
Defendant:
California Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Department of Veteran Affairs
as 2:2014cv02936
Plaintiff:
James Randall Hardy
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
