Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Ball v. AK Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Robert Harold Ball
Defendant:
AK Dept of Corrections, Row Taylor, Laura Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Alaska Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00009
Plaintiff:
Mark Stephin Horton
Defendant:
Alaska Dept. of Corrections, Joe Schmit, Ron Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Alaska Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. White
Defendant:
Alaska Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanderson v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2014cv00053
Plaintiff:
James Sanderson
Defendant:
Joe Schmidt, Debbie Miller, Michael Boothe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubble v. Cook Inlet Pretrial Facility et al
as 3:2013cv00147
Plaintiff:
Dennis Dale Hubble
Defendant:
Cook Inlet Pretrial Facility, Alaska Dept. of Corrections, Debbie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. The Geo Group et al
as 3:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
Ben Davis
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Rachael Hurt and Alaska Dept of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Hudson Corr Facility Medical Dept et al
as 3:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Davis
Defendant:
Hudson Corr Facility Medical Dept , Tami Anding , David Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. City of Dillingham Police Dept et al
as 3:2011cv00048
Plaintiff:
Stephen Delano Davis
Defendant:
City of Dillingham Police Dept, D. McIntire and Mike Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pedersen v. Anchorage Police Dept.
as 3:2010cv00207
Plaintiff:
Siegfried Pedersen
Defendant:
Anchorage Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
