Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Melanson v. Barnstable County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2012cv10687
Plaintiff:
Kyle Melanson
Defendant:
Barnstable County Sheriff's Department, James M Cummings, Patrick W Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells V. Massachusetts Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv11780
Plaintiff:
Sander D. Wells
Defendant:
Massachusetts Dept of Correction, Umass Correctional Health, Kathleen Dennehy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neto v. DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2011cv11510
Plaintiff:
Jose Neto
Defendant:
DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Richard E Davies, Michael Parrela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hotyckey v. Framingham Police Dept. et al
as 1:2011cv11308
Plaintiff:
Scott Hotyckey
Defendant:
Framingham Police Dept. , Steven Carl and Officer Cezer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dynamic Visions and Chief Bongam v. Dept. of Health & Services
as 1:2010cv10864
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Dynamic Visions and Chief Bongam
Defendant:
Dept. of Health & Services
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Tang v. DiPaola et al
as 1:2009cv10613
Plaintiff:
Toan Tang
Defendant:
James V. DiPaola, Cris Acres, Sheriff's Dept. Middlesex and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
M. et al v. KING PHILIP REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 1:2009cv10565
Plaintiff:
SEBASTIAN M., Lisa M. and Michael M.
Defendant:
KING PHILIP REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT and MASS DEPT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gadson v. U.S. Dept of Commerce
as 1:2008cv10571
Plaintiff:
Robert V. Gadson
Defendant:
U.S. Dept of Commerce
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cuevas v. Ashe et al
as 3:2007cv30055
Plaintiff:
Felix Luis Cuevas
Defendant:
Michael J. Ashe, Jr., Edward Weldon, Basil Tsagaris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
