Cases 21 - 30 of 534
Sowell et al v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv03532
Plaintiff:
Male Randy Sowell and D.D.S.S.
Defendant:
NYSDOCCS Anthony J. Annucci, NYDC Commissioner Cynthia Brann, PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS v. VINELAND POLICE DEPT.
as 1:2023cv03501
Plaintiff:
EDWIN LUGO RAMOS
Defendant:
VINELAND POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. KUHN et al
as 2:2023cv03361
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH SCOTT
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEFAZIO v. DOWNING et al
as 2:2023cv03307
Defendant:
ANTHONY DEFAZIO, BETTY DOWNING, MARCELINO ARCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
EZEKWO v. BRINGER et al
as 1:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
NORAH E. BRINGER, ARTHUR T. CATTERALL, DAVID A. HUBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EZEKWO v. BRINGER et al
as 2:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
NORAH E. BRINGER, ARTHUR T. CATTERALL, DAVID A. HUBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEILIO v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
MORGAN NEILIO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, KAREN TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
JONES v. TALLMADGE et al
as 3:2023cv01736
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. JONES
Defendant:
SCOTT J. TALLMADGE, KAREN CONTANTINO, BOUND BROOK POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
