Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Daniels v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Raeshon Kenneth Daniels
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept. of Correction, Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Jamaine J. Jones
Defendant:
Semple and Conn. Dept. of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maragh v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Leeroy Maragh
Defendant:
Semple and Conn Dept. of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latino v. Dept. of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
David Latino
Defendant:
Dept. of Correction and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Dept of Correction, Wilson, Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Zentek et al
as 3:2023cv01150
Plaintiff:
Aaron C. Marshall, Sr.
Defendant:
Christopher Zentek, Schwartz, Maureen Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Correction et al
as 3:2023cv00731
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Dept. of Correction, John Doe, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koram v. CT Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Akosua Boafoa Koram
Defendant:
CT Dept of Corrections, Angel Quirros, Trina Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelletier v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Roland Pelletier
Defendant:
State of Connecticut and Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
