Cases 1 - 10 of 182
AMERSON v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L AMERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN CURTIS L JEFFERIES, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tyrone Boykin
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florence v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Florence
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Futral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
FDOC, DONALD LEAVINS, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallman v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HALLMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN OTIS SMITH, JONES and SABRINA PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallmon v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hallman and Derrick Hallmon
Defendant:
Warden Otis Smith, Captain Jones and Sabrina Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Kershaw Correctional Institution
as 1:2023cv05747
Plaintiff:
Derrick George Holmes and Derrick George Daise
Defendant:
Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMERSON v. OLIVER
as 5:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AMERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, UNIT MANAGER CHARLES HUDSON, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Grantley v. Melissa Rollins
as 23-13211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK GRANTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MELISSA D. ROLLINS
ROBERTS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2023cv00538
Petitioner:
DERRICK DESHUN ROBERTS
Respondent:
J. Williams and S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
