Cases 1 - 10 of 194
LETTERLOUGH v. NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00284
Petitioner:
DERRICK DERRAIL LETTERLOUGH
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Letterlough v. North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02072
Petitioner:
Derrick Derrail Letterlough
Respondent:
North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LINDSEY EL BEY v. CLODFELTER
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JERVON LINDSAY EL BEY
Defendant:
District Attorney T. Lynn Clodfelter and STANLY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
DERRICK DASHAWN BROWN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Harrison v. USA
as 3:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Harrison
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lindsay El Bey v. Clodfelter
as 5:2024ct03008
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jervon Lindsay El Bey
Defendant:
T. Lynn Clodfelter and Stanly County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsay El Bey v. Clodfelter
as 5:2024ct03009
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jervon Lindsay El Bey
Defendant:
T. Lynn Clodfelter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. USA
as 1:2023cv01097
Petitioner:
DERRICK LAMONT DIXON, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jarvis v. Jarvis et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Carolyn Jarvis, Michelle Shook, Robyn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Iredell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Iredell County Detention Center, Travis Ward, John Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
