Cases 11 - 20 of 195
Jarvis v. Iredell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Iredell County Detention Center, Travis Ward, John Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pagan v. Brogdon et al
as 3:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Lance R Pagan
Defendant:
David Brogdon, Derrick Meek, Gaston County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Letterlough v. Cothron et al
as 5:2023ct03192
Plaintiff:
Derrick Derrail Letterlough and Derrick Letterlough
Defendant:
David E. Cothron, Demetrius A. Clark and Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Judge
as 5:2023hc02136
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Davenport
Respondent:
Warden C. Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davenport v. Judge
as 1:2023cv00159
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Davenport
Respondent:
C. Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Letterlough v. Clark et al
as 5:2023ct03042
Plaintiff:
Derrick Derrail Letterlough
Defendant:
Demetrius A. Clark, Ja'Maar Watson and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hester v. Flowers
as 5:2023hc02030
Petitioner:
Derrick Hester
Respondent:
Warden Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PETTIFORD v. GORDON et al
as 1:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
DERRICK U. PETTIFORD
Defendant:
JAMES G. GORDON, MASON J. HESTER, AUSTIN B. PENDRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. McFadden et al
as 3:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Roman Derrick Miller, Sr.
Defendant:
Gary L. McFadden, Mecklenburg Sheriff Department, County of Mecklenburg Government Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2022cv00658
Petitioner:
DERRICK ANTONIO WILLIAMS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
