Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Peterson et al v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
as 1:2011cv11115
Plaintiff:
Derrick Peterson and Esmeralda Peterson
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Niemic v. Clark et al
as 1:2011cv10863
Plaintiff:
Keith Niemic
Defendant:
Harold Clark, Luis Spencer, Peter Pepe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. St. Amand et al
as 1:2011cv10771
Plaintiff:
Derrick Washington
Defendant:
Peter St. Amand, John J. Jones, Glenn A. Doher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Dominion Energy Brayton Point LLC et al
as 1:2009cv10941
Plaintiff:
Derrick Davis
Defendant:
Dominion Energy Brayton Point LLC and Teak Mountain Products, LLC
Cross Claimant:
Dominion Energy Brayton Point LLC
Cross Defendant:
Teak Mountain Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Griffin v. Ashe et al
as 3:2008cv30207
Plaintiff:
Derrick Devon Griffin
Defendant:
Michael J. Ashe, Jr. and Hampden County Sheriff's Department and Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Griffin v. Ashe
as 3:2008cv30164
Petitioner:
Derrick Devon Griffin
Respondent:
Michael J. Ashe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Altman v. Committee for Public Counsel Services et al
as 3:2008cv30143
Plaintiff:
Derrick Altman
Defendant:
Committee for Public Counsel Services and Berkshire County Bar Advocates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Altman v. North Adams Police Department
as 3:2008cv30126
Plaintiff:
Derrick Altman
Defendant:
North Adams Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv11665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Taylor v. Sabol
as 4:2007cv40196
Petitioner:
Derrick Taylor
Respondent:
Carolyn Sabol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
