Cases 1 - 10 of 222
Felton v. Root Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Derrick Felton
Defendant:
Root Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sumrall v. Sollie
as 3:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sumrall
Defendant:
Billie Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. USA
as 4:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
Derrick Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stokes v. Jackson
as 3:2023cv03169
Plaintiff:
Derrick Stokes
Defendant:
Warden Donald Jackson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pinkston v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv03143
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, Commissioner Burl Cain, Kelly Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
Derrick Reynolds
Defendant:
United States of America and John Does Persons A-M
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sumrall v. Sollie
as 3:2023cv02993
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sumrall
Defendant:
Billy Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
Derrick Reynolds
Defendant:
United States of America and John Does Persons A-M
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
