Cases 1 - 10 of 15
McGowan v. Schofield et al
as 3:2015cv01083
Petitioner:
Johnny L. McGowan, Jr.
Respondent:
Derrick D. Schofield, Jason Woodall, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Simons v. State of Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
Barry P. Simons
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Department of Corrections, Derrick D. Schofield and Candace Whisman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. Chapman et al
as 1:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Ken D. Parrish
Defendant:
Arvil Chapman, Derrick D. Schofield, Jason Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harbison v. Thompson
as 3:2014cv00409
Plaintiff:
Edward Jerome Harbison
Defendant:
Evelyn Thompson, Michael Bryant, Derrick D. Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirchner v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv01267
Plaintiff:
Kyle Kirchner
Defendant:
State of Tennessee , Tennessee Department of Correction, Derrick D. Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Pillow v. Schofield et al
as 1:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Pillow
Defendant:
Derrick D. Schofield, Jerry Lester, Rose Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callis v. Miller et al
as 3:2012cv01052
Plaintiff:
George John Callis
Defendant:
James Miller, Derrick D. Schofield and Jerry Lester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gay v. Lester et al
as 1:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Gay
Defendant:
Jerry Lester, Ricky Mathis, Derrick D. Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meeks v. Schofield et al
as 3:2012cv00545
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Meeks
Defendant:
Derrick D. Schofield, Mike Christensen, Chris Aibangbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meeks v. Schofield et al
as 3:2012mc00035
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Meeks
Defendant:
Derrick D. Schofield, Mike Christensen, Chris Aibangbee and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
