Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nakitra Desha Davis v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv09860
Plaintiff:
Nakitra Desha Davis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Baker v. JUUL LABS, INC., et al
as 3:2022cv01854
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc.,, PAX Labs, Inc., Adam Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Paris Desha Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Protsman v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00922
Defendant:
Warden, A. Rai, D. Desha and others
Plaintiff:
E. Red Protsman and Eugene Red Protsman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Protsman v. Smith et al
as 2:2021cv01034
Defendant:
Warden, A. Rai, D. Desha and others
Plaintiff:
E. Red Protsman and Eugene Red Protsman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Arnaz Davis v. Bruce K. Matsuzaki et al
as 2:2020mc00064
Petitioner:
Deonnia Desha Shortie and Kenneth Arnaz Davis
Respondent:
Bruce K. Matsuzaki doing business as Manini Inc and The USP Store No 5115
Martin v. Desha
as 1:2016cv01353
Plaintiff:
Lanell Martin
Defendant:
D. Desha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin
as 1:2016at00749
Plaintiff:
Lanell Martin
Defendant:
D. Desha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southern California Regional Rail Authority et al v. Leticia Magdaleno et al
as 2:2010cv06365
Claimant:
AGL, Barbara Aaronson, Diane Adair and others
Defendant:
Joel Aaronson, Karen Abed, Magdaleno Aida and others
Plaintiff:
Connex Railroad LLC and Southern California Regional Rail Authority
Ometimes Widerkehr:
Helen Widerkehr
Carter v. Grannis, et al.
as 1:2010cv00043
Plaintiff:
Desha M. Carter
Defendant:
N. Grannis, K. Allison, Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Grannis
as 1:2009cv01457
Petitioner:
Desha Michael Carter
Respondent:
N. Grannis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
