Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MILLER et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04762
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MILLER and TONYA CRAWLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DETECTIVE BOVA, DETECTIVE JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RILEY v. DETECTIVE JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2022cv05187
Plaintiff:
LEROY RILEY
Defendant:
DETECTIVE JOHN DOE, DETECTIVE JANE DOE, PHILA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALVARADO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03763
Plaintiff:
Felishatay Alvarado
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DANIELLE OUTLAW, P/O JAMES ASHFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
ROBICHAW v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2021cv05282
Plaintiff:
RENALDO M. ROBICHAW
Defendant:
SEAN P. MCGEE, JOSEPH M. LYNCH, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNETT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04754
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 1, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 3, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CAPTAIN JOHN DOE 11 and others
Plaintiff:
TYRICO BARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2014cv02743
Plaintiff:
STEVEN TAYLOR
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ADAMS, HOWARD PETERMAN, JR., DETECTIVE JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON et al v. DETECTIVE JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2013cv02743
Plaintiff:
C. REGINALD JOHNSON and JAMES ALTON STEPHENS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE JOHN DOE, POLICE OFFICER JOHN/JANE DOE I, POLICE OFFICER JOHN/JANE DOE II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AUSTIN v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2007cv01540
Plaintiff:
ANGELA GEORGE AUSTIN
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP, WILLIAM CMOREY, FRED HARRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
