Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00926
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1812
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
City of White Plains v. REV Group LLC et al
as 2:2026cv01486
Plaintiff:
City of White Plains
Defendant:
REV Group LLC, E-ONE Inc, Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Neo Network, Inc. v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 26-1792
Plaintiff:
NEO NETWORK, INC.
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, JOHN PRYMACK, ARTHUR THOMPSON and others
City of Toledo v. REV Group LLC et al
as 1:2026cv01546
Plaintiff:
City of Toledo
Defendant:
REV Group LLC, E-ONE Inc, Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Demetrius Blackwell-Esters, et al v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 26-1799
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BLACKWELL-ESTERS
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, KAYLA ROE, ALEJANDRO VELA and others
City of Chula Vista v. REV Group LLC et al
as 2:2026cv01543
Plaintiff:
City of Chula Vista
Defendant:
REV Group LLC, E-ONE Inc, Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Macon Bibb County v. REV Group LLC et al
as 1:2026cv01536
Plaintiff:
Macon Bibb County
Defendant:
REV Group LLC, E-ONE Inc, Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv13264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Somes v. Live Nation Worldwide, Inc., d/b/a The Fillmore Detroit
as 2:2026cv13230
Plaintiff:
Joann Somes
Defendant:
Live Nation Worldwide, Inc., d/b/a The Fillmore Detroit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
