Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Johnson v. U.S. Govt et al et al
as 1:2014cv08649
Plaintiff:
Clarence Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Govt et al, John Bochner, Rick Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Samimi v. NAI-Plotkin/NAI-Global, et al
as 14-1990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEHZAD A. SAMIMI
Defendant - Appellee:
NAI-PLOTKIN/NAI-GLOBAL, EVAN PLOTKIN, President of NAI-Plotkin / NAI-Global, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Doe v. Deval et al
as 1:2014cv12813
Defendant:
Deval Patrick , Luis S. Spencer , Massachusetts Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrott v. Patrick et al
as 3:2014cv30101
Plaintiff:
Gary S Parrott
Defendant:
Deval Patrick and Michael J. Ashe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
H. et al v. Deval Patrick, et al
as 1:2014cv10106
Plaintiff:
Sam H. , Glorielyz R. , Robert C. and others
Defendant:
Deval Patrick, John Polanowicz, Kristin Thorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldi v. United States et al
as 1:2013cv11282
Plaintiff:
John A. Baldi
Defendant:
United States, Deval Patrick, Tim Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samimi v. NAI-Plotkin/NAI-Global, et al
as 3:2012cv30220
Plaintiff:
Behzad A. Samimi
Defendant:
NAI-Plotkin/NAI-Global, Evan Plotkin, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Children's Rights, Inc. v. Patrick et al
as 1:2012cv11007
Plaintiff:
Children's Rights, Inc.
Defendant:
Deval Patrick , Judyann Bigby and Angelo McClain
Re'Voal v. Patrick, et al
as 12-1577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM RE'VOAL
Defendant - Appellee:
DEVAL PATRICK, THOMAS M. MENINO, BARBARA FERRER, Boston Public Health Commissioner and others
Re'Voal v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts,et.al.
as 1:2012cv10269
Plaintiff:
William R. Re'Voal
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Deval Patrick, Thomas Menino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
