Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hill v. State Farm et al
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Hill
Defendant:
State Farm, TDCI, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hurt v. Carter et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Devona Clark, Carla White, Carol Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hurt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Perez-Mendez v. Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al
as 2:2019cv02386
Respondent:
Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and its office of Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), ICE/ERO Director, Tennessee Field Office and others
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Perez-Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Idehen et al v. DHS et al
as 3:2018cv00266
Plaintiff:
Tia Efe Idehen, Jaydon Idehen and Jaylen Idehen
Defendant:
DHS, Department of Law Metro, Department of Children Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. DHS, Lewisburg
as 1:2016cv00003
Plaintiff:
Steven Brandon Bates
Defendant:
DHS, Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith and Hammaker Office Records Management, Inc. v. DHS Worldwide, Inc. (TV2)
as 3:2015cv00563
Plaintiff:
Smith and Hammaker Office Records Management, Inc.
Defendant:
DHS Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
