Cases 11 - 20 of 128
Herrera-Diaz v. Barraza
as 1:2023cv00767
Petitioner:
Adrian Herrera-Diaz
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reynold Amaury v. Barraza
as 1:2023cv00073
Petitioner:
Pereyra Diaz Reynold Amaury
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VASQUEZ-DIAZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2022cv04579
Petitioner:
ANGEL VASQUEZ-DIAZ
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIAZ et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03286
Plaintiff:
EVA DIAZ, Frankie S Diaz, Frankie Diaz, Jr., Estate of and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Warden Pierre Lacomb, COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSA-DIAZ v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ
Defendant:
OBERLANDER, PERRY, FISCUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PONGRACZ v. TREATMENT TRENDS, INC. et al
as 5:2022cv02535
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER J PONGRACZ
Defendant:
TREATMENT TRENDS, INC. doing business as KEENAN HOUSE, SHARON MOORE, JACK GOLDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hernandez Diaz
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GONZALEZ DIAZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv03611
Plaintiff:
ANGEL EMILIO GONZALEZ DIAZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DIAZ v. PISTRO et al
as 2:2021cv02909
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and KEVIN PISTRO
Plaintiff:
JERSON DIAZ and JERSON DAVID DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Briggs
as 1:2021cv01145
Petitioner:
Eric Diaz
Respondent:
Warden Briggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
