Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Durbin v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00973
Plaintiff:
Mark Frederick Durbin and Mark F Durbin
Defendant:
State of Washington, King County, Henry H Judson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chennette et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Nathan Chennette, Larry Akins, Gary Alger and others
Defendant:
Porch.com, GoSmith Inc, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Mickelson v. Dicks Sporting Goods Inc
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Ian Mickelson
Defendant:
Dicks Sporting Goods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Dick v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2022cv00079
Petitioner:
Melissa S Dick
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper v. Dick Hannah Toyota et al
as 3:2022cv05065
Plaintiff:
John Harper
Defendant:
Dick Hannah Toyota and Toyota Motor North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
Dick v. District Court for Lincoln County
as 2:2021cv00348
Petitioner:
Melissa S Dick
Respondent:
District Court for Lincoln County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dick v. University of Washington et al
as 2:2021cv00805
Defendant:
JoAnne Wuitschick, Meegan Corcoran, Loren Tuttle and others
Plaintiff:
Henry J.B. Dick and Henry JB Dick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc v. Smokey Point Commercial LLC
as 2:2020cv01239
Plaintiff:
Dick's Sporting Goods Inc
Defendant:
Smokey Point Commercial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Sinclair et al
as 4:2018cv05195
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Stephen Sinclair, Richard Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
