Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Dickerson v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2023cv02259
Plaintiff:
Robert Clyde Dickerson
Defendant:
Louisiana State, St. Tammany Parish Jail, St. Tammany Parish Sheriff Department and others
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Bickham
as 3:2023cv00195
Defendant:
Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson and Edward Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Bickham
as 3:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson
Defendant:
Edward Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Bickham et al
as 3:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson
Respondent:
Edward Dustin Bickham and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
West v. Dickerson et al
as 2:2022cv05336
Plaintiff:
Tristan Trumaine West
Defendant:
Michael Dickerson, Dustin Locke and Ivey Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Bickham
as 3:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson
Defendant:
Edward Dustin Bickham and Robin D. Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Bickham
as 2:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
Fard Abdur Rahman Dickerson
Defendant:
Edward Dustin Bickham and Robin D. Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Bickham et al
as 2:2021cv01972
Plaintiff:
Fard A.R. Dickerson
Defendant:
Edward Bickham
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dickerson v. USA
as 3:2021cv01755
Petitioner:
Thomas A Dickerson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Prejean v. Jefferson Davis Parish Jail et al
as 2:2020cv00323
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office Jefferson Davis Parish, Georgia Correctional Health, Ivy Woods and others
Plaintiff:
David J Prejean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
