Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv01939
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BRYANT, DR. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford, Jr. v. Dickerson et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Alfred Ashford, Jr.
Defendant:
Corey Dickerson, Deputy Warden Ray and Deputy Warden Levalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford, Jr. v. Ray et al
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Alfred Ashford, Jr.
Defendant:
Mrs. Ray, Warden Briggs, Deputy Warden Levalley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DICKERSON v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2022cv04940
Plaintiff:
TOSHA DICKERSON
Defendant:
TIMARIOUS KEYONTAE TRAINE EDWARDS, TIMARIOUS EDWARDS, WESTERN EXPRESS, INC., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dickerson v. EXPRESS SERVICES INC.
as 2:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Toya Dickerson
Defendant:
EXPRESS SERVICES INC. d/b/a EXPRESS EMPLOYMENT PROFESSIONALS and EXPRESS EMPLOYMENT PROFESSIONALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dickerson v. White
as 3:2020cv00094
Respondent:
Douglas E White
Petitioner:
Damon Gerard Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DICKERSON v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05620
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
MARK DICKERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BANKS v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2019cv01169
Respondent:
ASIA YOUNG, DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Banks v. Young et al
as 1:2019cv01237
Defendant:
Asia Young, Warden Orlando Harper, Caitlyn Dickerson and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
