Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jia v. Weee! Inc.
as 1:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Helen Jia, Tingting Ding, Haoquan Liang and others
Defendant:
WEEE! Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Abittan v. Chao et al
as 5:2020cv09340
Defendant:
Lily Chao, Damien Ding, Eian Labs Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ariel Abittan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Makhsous et al v. Mastroianni et al
as 9:2020cv81141
Plaintiff:
Xuejun Makhsous, Ying Yu, Xuezheng Ding and others
Defendant:
1568 Broadway Funding 100 GP, LLC, Nicholas Mastroianni, II, Ronald Fieldstone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bangladesh Bank v. Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00983
Defendant:
Philrem Service Corp., Centurytex Trading, Michael Bastista and others
Plaintiff:
Bangladesh Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Fan v. Mona Shah & Associates, PLLC et al.
as 1:2019cv00490
Defendant:
Nuride Transportation Group, LLC, Mona Shah, Esq., Mona Shah, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Wei Ding Fan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Ding v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2017cv01077
Plaintiff:
Bai Ding
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Multi Parts Supply USA, Inc. et al v. Hao et al
as 9:2012cv81121
Plaintiff:
Multi Parts Supply USA, Inc. and Alternative Automotive Parts, Inc.
Defendant:
Zheng Xiang Hao, Chen Ding Yi and Ruian Shengdian Auto Parts Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
DINGS et al v. LENHOFF
as 5:2012cv04559
Plaintiff:
RYAN P. DINGS and JOANN N. DINGS
Defendant:
GERARD LENHOFF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Mark Okano, et al v. Trex Company, Inc.
as 10-15871
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ERIC ROSS, BRADLEY S. HURETH and STEPHANIE BAPTISTA
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK OKANO and SHARON DING
Defendant - Appellee:
TREX COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
