Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
E.W. et al v. French et al
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
E. W., J. W., Joseph Williams and others
Defendant:
Daniel French, Jeanne Collins and Barstow Unified Union School Board of Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.H. et al v. French et al
as 2:2020cv00151
Plaintiff:
Daniel Foley, C.R., Darlene Hester and others
Defendant:
South Hero Board of School Directors, Champlain Islands Unified Union School District Board of School Directors, Michael Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.H. et al v. French et al
as 5:2020cv00151
Plaintiff:
Darlene Hester, James Hester, Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington, Vermont and others
Defendant:
Daniel M. French, Michael Clark and South Hero Board of School Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00228
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
