Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Morris v. Director of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Shiloh M. Morris
Defendant:
Director of Corrections and Entire Nursing Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirk Robinson v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-1392
Petitioner:
Kirk D. Robinson
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of RTC and Rob Jeffreys, Director of Corrections, Nebraska
Kirk Robinson v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-1033
Petitioner:
Kirk D. Robinson
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of RTC and Rob Jeffreys, Director of Corrections, Nebraska
John Bridges v. Director of Corrections
as 23-1963
Petitioner:
John C. Bridges
Respondent:
Director of Corrections
Bridges v. Director of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
John Clark Bridges
Respondent:
Director of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Bridges v. Director of Corrections
as 23-1052
Petitioner:
John C. Bridges
Respondent:
Director of Corrections, North Dakota DOCR
Bridges v. Director of Corrections
as 1:2022cv00213
Petitioner:
John Clark Bridges
Respondent:
Director of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bridges v. Director of Corrections
as 1:2022cv00177
Petitioner:
John Clark Bridges
Respondent:
Director of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Michael Gardner v. Joe Page, et al
as 21-2835
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Valentine Gardner
Defendant / Appellee:
Joe Page, III, Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC, Dallan Brownfield, Sgt., Grimes Unit, ADC, Joshua Jones, C/O; Corporal, Grimes Unit, ADC and others
Terrance Proctor v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction, et al
as 21-2114
Defendant / Appellee:
Benny Magness, Member, Board of Corrections, in his Official and Individual Capacities, James B. Depriest, In his Official and Individual Capacities, Lona McCastlain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrance Proctor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
