Cases 41 - 50 of 511
Turner v. Director , TDCJ-CID
as 7:2022cv00106
Petitioner:
Ronnie Turner
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Money v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
Chris Lewis Money
Defendant:
United States, State of Texas Gregg Abbot, Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin, Lonnie Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv02286
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
R Bowers, J Rodriguez, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cervantez v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maria Cervantez and Maria Concepcion Valenzuela Cervantez
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Cris Love, Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slate v. Nelson
as 2:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
John Nekita Slate
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin, T Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweeney v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00893
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Sweeney
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2022cv02162
Plaintiff:
Michael Geoffrey Peters
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Dinah Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
NFN Bowers, NFN Wonders, NFN Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Lumpkin et al
as 3:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
Ralph Sherman Wilkins
Defendant:
Ben Woodard, John Best and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmett v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv01954
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
