Cases
Mumia Abu-Jamal v. Secretary PA Dept of Corr, et al
as 17-1156
Plaintiff - Appellee: MUMIA ABU-JAMAL, PADRP
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PAUL NOEL, DOC Bureau of Health Care Services Chief of Clinical Services, BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES ASSISTANT MEDICAL DIRECTOR, member of Hepatitis C Treatment Committee and others
Defendant: CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS REPRESENTATIVES, on the Hepatitis C Treatment Committee and TREATING PHYSICIAN SCI MAHANOY
Defendant - Appellant: CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS
Mumia Abu-Jamal v. Secretary PA Dept of Corr, et al
as 17-1125
Plaintiff - Appellee: MUMIA ABU-JAMAL, PADRP
Defendant - Appellant: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PAUL NOEL, DOC Bureau of Health Care Services Chief of Clinical Services, BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES ASSISTANT MEDICAL DIRECTOR, member of Hepatitis C Treatment Committee and others
Defendant: CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS REPRESENTATIVES, on the Hepatitis C Treatment Committee and TREATING PHYSICIAN SCI MAHANOY
Defendant - Appellee: CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS
Kenneth Johnson v. Keith Papendick, et al
as 15-2056
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: KEITH PAPENDICK, MD, (RMO), TERENCE WHITEMAN, Sup. Physician, LYNN LARSON and others
GANTZ v. UNCLES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00218
Plaintiff: MALCOLM GANTZ
Defendant: I. UNCLES , D. PRICE , STEVEN R. GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gantz v. Uncles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv01687
Plaintiff: Malcolm Gantz
Defendant: I. Uncles, D. Price, Steven R. Glunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedric Young v. Stefanic, et al
as 11-3395
Plaintiff - Appellant: CEDRIC L. YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee: STEFANIC, RICHARD ELLERS, Director of Bureau of Health Care Services, BLATT and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?