Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CLINTON v. MEIRING et al
as 1:2022cv02337
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CLINTON
Defendant:
ADRIENNE MEIRING and DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton v. Meiring et al
as 3:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
Kevin Clinton
Defendant:
Adrienne Meiring and Disciplinary Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHI v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
XIAOLONG SHI
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, TODD ROKITA, INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAIRSTON v. MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT #32 -- CLERK(S) OF THE MARION CIRCUIT COURT et al
as 1:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
JOHN MANUEL HAIRSTON
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT #32 -- CLERK(S) OF THE MARION CIRCUIT COURT, INDIANA SUPREME COURT, DOXPOP, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie C Moline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00907
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
KM a minor 1690 2010
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moline v. Illinois State of et al
as 3:2020cv00908
Defendant:
Illinois State of, Habecker Morris and Dluski LLC, Shashi Vishwanath and others
Plaintiff:
NM a minor 7319 2012
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VALDEZ v. MONTANA SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2009cv01323
Petitioner:
SANTIAGO VALDEZ
Respondent:
MONTANA SUPREME COURT, JON KEVIN REID, KIMBERLY J. DEL GRECO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edilov v. Pratt et al
as 1:2008cv00285
Plaintiff:
Magomed Edilov
Defendant:
Judge Charles Pratt, Judge Kenneth Scheibenberger, Philip R Terrill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
