Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Tyler et al v. Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board et al
as 2:2018cv02731
Plaintiff:
Maurice L. Tyler
Defendant:
Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board, Louisiana Supreme Court, Orleans Public Defenders and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Armstrong v. Reed et al
as 4:2018cv00727
Plaintiff:
Tristan Omarr Armstrong
Defendant:
Susan D. Reed, The Bexar County District Attorney's Office, Sid L Harle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Keller et al
as 3:2018cv00055
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Geoffrey Michael Keller , Dallas County District Attorney's Office and Dallas County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017mc00288
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sellers v. Nueces County, Texas et al
as 2:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Brian Sellers
Defendant:
Nueces County, Texas, Nueces County District Attorney's Office and David Stith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Patterson et al
as 2:2017cv06361
Plaintiff:
Monica Jackson
Defendant:
Clint Patterson , Greg Champagne , St. Charles Parish Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. McCoy et al
as 1:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
Treniece Marea Parker
Defendant:
Darryl Glen McCoy, Sr., FBI, Biloxi Municipal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Morgan v. Connick et al
as 2:2017cv05319
Plaintiff:
Jerome Morgan
Defendant:
Harry F Connick, Sharon Andrews, Karen Godail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Reed et al
as 2:2017cv03696
Plaintiff:
Marvin Cobb
Defendant:
Walter P. Reed, Rodney Stain, Scott Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
