Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bearden v. St Clair County, Ala District Attorney's Office et al
as 4:2016cv01424
Plaintiff:
Rowdy Brent Bearden
Defendant:
St Clair County Ala District Attorney's Office and Rick Oliver
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guerrier v. Madison County District Attorney's Office et al
as 5:2015cv02260
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Guerrier
Defendant:
Madison County District Attorney's Office, P Mark Sandlin, Rebekah A Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Strange et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2014cv01106
Plaintiff:
Betty Wilson
Defendant:
Luther Strange , Madison County District Attorney's Office and Robert L. Broussard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry, et al. v. Russell County Board of Education, et al. (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 3:2014cv00953
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Terry, Sr., Edward J. Terry, Jr. and Dymphia M. Terry
Defendant:
Russell County Board of Education , Russell County High School , Shawn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Mobile, Alabama District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2014cv00195
Petitioner:
Richard Daron Kennedy
Respondent:
Mobile, Alabama District Attorney's Office, Robin D. Scales, Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kennedy v. Mobile, Alabama District Attorney's Office et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00212
Plaintiff:
Richard Daron Kennedy
Defendant:
Mobile, Alabama District Attorney's Office, Robin D. Scales, Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gilley v. Cullman County District Attorney's Office
as 4:2013cv01116
Plaintiff:
Dale William Gilley, Jr
Defendant:
Cullman County District Attorney's Office
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.