Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Barnes v. Zitman
as 23-20484
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Micheal W. Barnes
Defendant / Appellee:
John E. Zitman, Diane Hill, Larry Finley and others
Barnes v. Zitman et al
as 4:2023cv02846
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL W. BARNES
Defendant:
ASST. CHIEF JOHN E. ZITMAN, DEPUTY DIANE HILL, LIEUTENANT LARRY FINLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bay Area Unitarian v. Ogg
as 23-20165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bay Area Unitarian Universalist Church, Drink Houston Better, L.L.C., doing business as Antidote Coffee and Perk You Later, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg, County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez, Webster Acting Chief Pete Bacon and others
Brooks II v. Harris County Jail et al
as 4:2020cv02683
Defendant:
District Attorney Kim Ogg, District Court and Harris County Jail
Plaintiff:
Gregory W. Brooks II and Gregory W Brooks, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeRouen v. Ogg et al
as 4:2020cv02420
Defendant:
District Attorney Kim Ogg, Public Defender Alex Bunin and Harris County, Texas
Plaintiff:
Ronald DeRouen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Sosa, Jr. v. Kim Ogg
as 20-20344
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS COLEMAN SOSA, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY KIM OGG
Sosa v. Ogg
as 4:2020cv01984
Defendant:
District Attorney Kim Ogg
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coleman Sosa, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sosa v. Ogg
as 4:2020cv01786
Defendant:
District Attorney Kim Ogg
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coleman Sosa, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clinton Ards v. Robert Johnson, et al
as 20-20114
Defendant / Appellee:
C. IRVING, Irving Law Firm, WARDEN CROWLEY, Holiday Unit, P. THIELKE, Parole Department Austin, Texas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON L. ARDS
Albert v. The Honorable Maria Jackson et al
as 4:2019cv04828
Defendant:
District Attorney Kim Ogg, The Honorable Maria Jackson and The State of Texas
Plaintiff:
Christopher Albert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
