Cases 11 - 20 of 4,908
Doe v. ESA P Portfolio LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
ESA P PORTFOLIO LLC, ESA P Portfolio Operating Lessee LLC, ESA P Portfolio MD Trust and others
Moseley v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Kelshaun D Moseley
Defendant:
Henderson, Watson, Ahka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Leggins et al
as 4:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Thomas
Defendant:
Mr. Unknown Leggins, Mrs. Cristy Unknown, Mrs. Jessica Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humes v. T-Mobile Security John Doe
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
T-Mobile Security John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Paul v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Rico Paul
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Caleb Thompson, Justin Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
T.F. v. Gerber Products Company et al
as 4:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
T.F.
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company, Nestle S.A., Beech-Nut Nutrition Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kristine Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Bill Stange, Billy Loflin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moran v. John Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Ryan Moran
Defendant:
John Doe and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. doing business as FedEx Ground
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Criner v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Phillip Criner
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contego Spa Designs, Inc. v. Soho Nails Spa LLC
as 4:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Contego Spa Designs, Inc.
Defendant:
Soho Nails Spa LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
