Cases 1 - 10 of 1,075
Brown v. Woodside et al
as 3:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Darrion Brown
Defendant:
Lt Woodside, C/O Cook, Pinckneyville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flood v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Patrick Flood and Patrick S Flood
Defendant:
William Hyatte, Joshua Snow, Lorna Harbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Titus v. Officer Thornton, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
ADAM TITUS
Defendant:
OFFICER THORNTON, Placement Officer, JOHN/JANE DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, WARDEN GOMEZ and others
Williams v. Doe #1 et al
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dominic Williams
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and Jane Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClendon v. Sankey et al
as 3:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Duane McClendon
Defendant:
Shaquille Sankey, John Doe and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Carbondale Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Carbondale Memorial Hospital, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mason v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Ray Mason
Defendant:
John Doe, Major Matthews, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. Galloway et al
as 3:2024cv01080
Plaintiff:
Micheal N.B. Attaway
Defendant:
Darren Galloway, Mrs. Walker, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
