Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bailey v. Multnomah County Sheriff et al
as 3:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Edward Bailey
Defendant:
Multnomah County Sheriff, Michael Reese, CPT. Eric P. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grange v. Prestige Financial Services Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01561
Plaintiff:
Todd Grange
Defendant:
John & Jane Does 2-10, Prestige Financial Services Inc., Repossession Company Auto Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vulliet v. Kautz et al
as 6:2016cv00302
Defendant:
Tammy Baney, Kate Brown, Laurie E. Craghead and others
Plaintiff:
Charles F Vulliet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. Bolek et al
as 3:2012cv00136
Defendant:
Lila Ashenbrenner, Cindy Bolek, Rachel Bridges and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mata-Gonzalez et al v. Monico et al
as 3:2011cv00260
Defendant:
C. Bowman, City of Cornelius, Dustin DeHaven and others
Plaintiff:
Lilia Lopez-Guzman, Diego Mata-Gonzalez, Johnny Mata-Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindsey et al v. Myer et al
as 2:2010cv01437
Defendant:
Sr. Officer Tony Barnett, Sgt. Gary Bell, Det. Tom Blackman and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Eugene Lindsey and Rona Edith Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province et al
as 3:2009cv01030
Plaintiff:
John Doe, I, John Doe, I, John Doe, 2 and others
Defendant:
The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, The Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, The Society of Jesus, Alaska and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Doe, 1 et al v. Society of Jesus, Oregon Province et al
as 3:2009cv01030
Plaintiff:
John Doe, 1, John Doe, 1, John Doe, 2 and others
Defendant:
Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, Society of Jesus, Oregon Province, Society of Jesus, Alaska and others
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
