Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Munn v. Clark et al
as 5:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Lester Joe Munn
Defendant:
Sandra Clark, Michael Bates, Jimmy Sission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Townsend et al
as 6:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
Todrick Morris
Defendant:
Lonnie R. Townsend, LaMorris Marshall, Douglas Foust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kingsbury v. John Doe 1 et al
as 9:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Marquis Kingsbury
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliphant v. Pace et al
as 6:2022cv00274
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Pam Pace, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Lavail Oliphant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grizzle v. Coffman et al
as 9:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Bruce Johnson, Mervin Cleveland, Martha Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy, Sr. v. Wright et al
as 6:2019cv00510
Defendant:
Lt. Michael L Odom, MHC Lyndsey Howell, Sgt. FNU McAndrews and others
Plaintiff:
Prince McCoy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller, et al v. Olawoye, et al
as 4:2019cv00115
Defendant:
OLALEKAN STANLEY OLAWOYE, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Cassidy Fuller, Michael Fuller, Michael S Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Fuller v. Fuller et al
as 4:2019cv00112
Defendant:
OLALEKAN STANLEY OLAWOYE, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fuller
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Perez v. Davis et al
as 9:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
Josue Perez
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Jack Garner, David Moya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kharb, Praveen v. Ericsson, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00619
Plaintiff:
Praveen Kharb
Defendant:
Ericsson Inc, John Doe 1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
