Cases 1 - 10 of 317
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1101
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
MICHELLE BIELA, SANTORO, HENRY MUSHI and others
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
STEDMAN, Nurse, KATHRYN CARHART, Nurse, RALPH, Nurse and others
Doe #1 (ELA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (ELA), John Doe #2 (BMA), John Doe #3 (RNB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Iraheta v. Doe (1) et al
as 4:2024cv01163
Plaintiff:
Jose D. Iraheta
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Doe No.1 et al v. Rajveer LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
RAJVEER LLC, ATHARV, LLC, RAJPRABHU HOTEL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589 Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA)
Bradshaw v. Uhler
as 24-446
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Defendant:
Corrections Officer WALRATH, Upstate Correctional Facility, formerly known as John Does 4 and 6, Sergeant FLETCHER, Upstate Correctional Facility, TROMBLY, Correction Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility, formerly known as Trombley and others
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-427
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
Captain TOLMIE, BLEKIS, PELLITERI and others
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant / Appellee:
Captain TOLMIE, BLEKIS, PELLITERI and others
Defendant:
ROLLIN COOK, WILLIAM MULLIGAN, AMONDA HANNAH and others
John Doe # 1 (BLB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
John Doe # 1 (BLB), John Doe #2 (EDH), John Doe #32 (RAK) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
