Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Bulson-Bratton v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2020cv00282
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Torrie Carlos Bulson-Bratton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00137
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, John Doe, 3, Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Rote v. Marshall et al
as 3:2019cv00082
Defendant:
Linda L. Marshall, Oregon State Bar, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Rote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Alqudah v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2018cv02143
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Rajaa Alqudah
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bursell v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv01978
Defendant:
Vaafusuaga, Amsberry, Michael Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Dylan Isaac Bursell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hasson v. Meyer et al
as 3:2018cv01928
Defendant:
Sgt. Dwyer, John Does 4-10, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Robert Hasson and Robert Hasson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konecny v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv01842
Defendant:
Vaafusuaga, Amsberry, Michael Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Ehren Konecny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez v. Jones et al
as 2:2018cv00375
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Luz A. Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Arnold v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00366
Plaintiff:
David Ray Arnold
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphers v. Peters et al
as 2:2017cv01178
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Jane Doe, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Blake Edward Humphers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
