Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2019cv00896
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, John Doe I and John Doe II
Plaintiff:
Taumara Nicole Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Armstrong v. Wal-Mart et al
as 3:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Carol Armstrong
Defendant:
Wal-Mart , Company Doe, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pace v. Candler et al
as 1:2016cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jerritt Pace
Defendant:
Lt. Candler, Lt. Reid, Lt. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allard v. Laroya et al
as 1:2015cv01678
Plaintiff:
Sandra C. Allard
Defendant:
Jimmy Laroya , John Doe, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bradley et al v. Stupar et al
as 4:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Erick Bradley , Eboni Pruden Bradley , Shaheem Pruden and others
Defendant:
DEA Agent Michael S. Stupar, Unnamed DEA Agents John Doe 1, 2, 3, and 4, Joseph Jansson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. City of Newport News et al
as 4:2014cv00165
Plaintiff:
Thomas T. Simmons, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Newport News , Newport News Police Officer, B. Wilson, Badge No. 1564 , Newport News Police Sargent William Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shelton v. United States Post Office et al
as 3:2008cv00399
Plaintiff:
John Shelton
Defendant:
United States Post Office, Employee One/ John Doe I and Employee Two/John Doe II
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Doe I et al v. pauliewalnuts et al
as 5:2008mc00001
Plaintiff:
Doe I and Doe II
Defendant:
pauliewalnuts, neoprag, STANFORDtroll and others
Movant:
AOL, LLC
Frey v. Doe I et al
as 2:2007cv00537
Plaintiff:
Brandie Frey
Defendant:
John Doe I, John Doe II, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
