Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hedrick v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jesse Alan Hedrick
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch, Robert Darling, Jeremy Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shell v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2022cv03160
Plaintiff:
Robert Noble Shell
Defendant:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez, Mr or Mrs. Jon Doe, Dr. Jon or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spivey v. Ryles et al
as 2:2019cv00155
Plaintiff:
Robert D Spivey
Defendant:
J Salles, R Ryles and John Doe/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Houston County et al
as 9:2018cv00182
Defendant:
DOE JANE, HOUSTON COUNTY, DOE JOHN and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE RAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Caraway v. Emitt et al
as 4:2016cv03617
Plaintiff:
Robinson Edward Caraway
Defendant:
Ed Emitt, Ron Hickman, Sergeant Wolfford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Daniel et al
as 4:2016mc00350
Plaintiff:
Robert James Fox
Defendant:
Reece Daniel, Raissi MO, Jason Price and others
Fox v. Daniel et al
as 6:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Robert James Fox
Defendant:
Reece Daniel, The State of Texas, County of Cherokee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Global Development Strategies, Inc.
as 5:2013cv01158
Defendant:
ABC Companies, Global Development Strategies, Inc. and Various Johns Does & Jane Does
Plaintiff:
David Lee Garcia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Deanda v. Owens et al
as 1:2010cv00422
Plaintiff:
Johnny Deanda
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe Agents Actors, Employees and Rissie Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deanda v. Owens et al
as 3:2010cv01125
Plaintiff:
Johnny Deanda
Defendant:
Rissie Owens, John Doe, Jane Doe Agents Actors Employees, John Doe, Jane Doe Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
