Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ALSTON v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2024cv01574
Plaintiff:
LAMAR ALSTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, SUPT. SORBER, SUPT. TERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. SCHWEIZER et al
as 2:2021cv01548
Plaintiff:
Clevon Jenkins
Defendant:
Officer PATRICK BANNING, OFFICER SCOTT SCHWEIZER, Officer MICHAEL SZELAGOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pippen v. SCHWEIZER et al
as 2:2021cv01550
Defendant:
Officer PATRICK BANNING, Officer SCOTT SCHWEIZER, Officer ERIK PROSS and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pippen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. SCHWEIZER et al
as 2:2021cv01551
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lawrence and Edward Fountain
Defendant:
PATRICK BANNING, ERIK PROSS, JOHN DOE OFFICERS 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Espigh v. Borough of Lewistown et al
as 1:2019cv02221
Defendant:
John Doe Officer 3, John Doe Officer 2, David K. Clemens and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Ryan Espigh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SEAWRIGHT v. BANNING et al
as 2:2018cv04811
Defendant:
OFFICER PATRICK BANNING and JOHN JOHN/JANE DOE OFFICERS 1-7
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SEAWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv02208
Plaintiff:
COREY TAYLOR
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN DOE OFFICER 1, JOHN DOE OFFICER 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NICHOLAS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06610
Plaintiff:
VICTOR NICHOLAS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, KEVIN CLARK and JOHN DOES OFFICERS 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CEPEDA et al v. LANCASTER CITY et al
as 5:2014cv02429
Plaintiff:
LUIS CEPEDA and MARK CEPEDA
Defendant:
LANCASTER CITY, ERIC PANONE, ADAM WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHRISTINE v. ROSATI et al
as 2:2013cv01241
Plaintiff:
JACOB CHRISTINE
Defendant:
ROSATI, JOHN DOE OFFICER #1, JOHN DOE OFFICER #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
