Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Howard v. Martin et al
as 2:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Randy Howard
Defendant:
Clarence E Martin, Marked Tree Arkansas, City of, Marked Tree Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Qualls v. Russellville, City of et al
as 4:2021cv01073
Plaintiff:
David Qualls
Defendant:
Russellville Arkansas, City of, J Richardson, K Cromer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Dickson et al
as 6:2018cv06124
Defendant:
John Doe, 1-50, The Malvern City Police Department, The Hot Spring County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goins v. Oakhill, M.D. et al
as 5:2016cv05301
Plaintiff:
Della Goins
Defendant:
Gregory J. Oakhill, M.D., Gregory J. Oakhill, M.D., P.A., Highlands Oncology Group, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Roberts et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 5:2013cv05128
Plaintiff:
Verleta Roberts and Quin Roberts
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and John Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Smith v. No Trustee On Deed Of Trust et al
as 6:2012cv06124
Plaintiff:
Martha Smith
Defendant:
No Trustee On Deed Of Trust, Wilson and Associates, PLLC , Everhome Mortgage Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Martin v. Campbell et al
as 4:2009cv04077
Plaintiff:
Dan L. Martin
Defendant:
Charles Campbell, Peggy Cryer, Janice Vigh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Qualls et al v. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv02037
Plaintiff:
Roberta Qualls and Dwayne Qualls
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
