Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Graham et al v. DuPont de Nemours, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01551
Plaintiff:
Laurence J Graham, Laurence John Graham, Larry Graham and others
Defendant:
DuPont de Nemours, Inc., Dow Chemical Company, Dow, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Page v. Topix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00828
Plaintiff:
Laurie Page
Defendant:
Topix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and DOES 1-25 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Lindhurst v. City of Berkeley et al
as 4:2023cv04513
Plaintiff:
Brian Lindhurst
Defendant:
CITY OF BERKELEY, David Marble and DOES 1-25 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Savok-Jimenez v. County of Lake et al
as 1:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Chad Savok-Jimenez
Defendant:
County of Lake, Deputy Cody White and DOES 1-25, inclusive.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04859
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Stanfield v. Tawkify, Inc.
as 3:2020cv07000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Jeremy Stanfield and Jeremy Stanfield
Defendant:
DOES 1-25, inclusive. and Tawkify, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
L.S. et al v. Henderson
as 3:2020cv04637
Plaintiff:
Felina Ramirez, Brianna Colombo and L.S.
Defendant:
DOES 1-25, inclusive. and Richard Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. GEICO General Insurance Co., et al
as 4:2020cv01320
Defendant:
DOES 1-25, inclusive. and GEICO General Insurance Co.,
Plaintiff:
Kara Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall et al v. City of Walnut Creek et al
as 3:2019cv05716
Defendant:
City of Walnut Creek, Tammy Keagy, Matt Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Hall and Taun Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
