Cases 1 - 10 of 75
DOHERTY v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
STEVEN J DOHERTY
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOHERTY v. INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01772
Plaintiff:
JEWEL LEE DOHERTY
Defendant:
INDIANA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, THE COMMUNITIES AT INDIAN HAVEN, INC. and AFFINITY HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOHERTY et al v. FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC. et al
as 2:2023mc00088
Plaintiff:
GUDRYN K. DOHERTY, FAUN DOHERTY and EDWARD E. QUAM
Defendant:
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INC. and RICHARD BERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
STUBBS v. SKREPENAK et al
as 1:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Henry Christopher Stubbs, III
Defendant:
Gregory A. Skrepenak, Todd Vonderheid, Stephen A. Urban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROYER v. ROBERTSON et al
as 3:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
MARGO L. ROYER
Defendant:
CPL MATTHEW D. ROBERTSON, OFFICER LANCE THOMPSON, CHIEF OF POLICE DUANE CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STUBBS v. SKREPENAK et al
as 2:2022cv00889
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
GREGORY A. SKREPENAK, TODD VONDERHEID, STEPHEN A. URBAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARD v. BARD et al
as 3:2021cv00185
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G. BARD
Defendant:
PATRICK BARD, JOHN BLACK, ALICE DOHERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KUSHIMO v. SPAULDING
as 2:2020cv00767
Respondent:
SPAULDING
Petitioner:
DOHERTY KUSHIMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LACHER et al v. ARAMARK CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv00687
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUSKOWSKI, HENRY J. LACHER, WILLIAM WERONKO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
