Cases 21 - 30 of 98
Fruhling v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00300
Plaintiff:
Miriam Fruhling
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and Dolgencorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dean et al v. Gildan Activewear, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02717
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dean and Tammy Byerly-Dean
Defendant:
Gildan Activewear, Inc., Gildan USA, Inc., Gildan Yarns, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mason v. Wal-Mart Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Guy Mason
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Corporation , Kmart Holding Corporation, Family Dollar Stores of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Dollar General et al
as 2:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
Jonna M Woods
Defendant:
Dollar General , DolGen Midwest, LLC and United Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kimberlin v. Dollar General Corporation
as 2:2011cv01039
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Kimberlin
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bender v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00457
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, Inc. , Dollar General Partners , Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Deanne Bender
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fagin v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00456
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, Inc. , Dollar General Partners , Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Fagin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Picketts v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00454
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, Inc. , Dollar General Partners , Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Picketts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
