Cases 1 - 10 of 47
United States of America v. Jose Guzman-Dominguez
as 24-2063
Petitioner:
JOSE REMBERTO GUZMAN-DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States v. Dominguez-Dominguez
as 24-2051
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
URIEL DOMINGUEZ-DOMINGUEZ
Smith v. Sheriff of Sheridan County Jail, et al
as 24-8005
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Respondent:
SHERIFF OF SHERIDAN COUNTY JAIL, in his official capacity ,also known as Levi Dominguez, SHERIDAN CHIEF OF POLICE, in his official capacity, also known as Travis Koltiska and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Smith v. Sheridan County Sheriff
as 24-8020
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Respondent:
SHERIDAN COUNTY SHERIFF, a/k/a Levi Dominguez
Smith v. Dominguez, et al
as 24-8018
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Defendant:
LEVI DOMINGUEZ, individually and in his official capacity as Sheridan County Sheriff, TRAVIS KOLTISKA, individually and in his official capacity as Sheridan Police Department Chief of Police, CHRISTOPHER LAROSA, individually and in his official capacity as Sheridan County Prosecutor and others
Dominguez v. CIR
as 24-9001
Petitioner:
JACINTO RAMON DOMINGUEZ, JR.
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
In re: Smith
as 24-8004
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Respondent:
SHERIDAN CHIEF OF POLICE, in his official capacity, also known as Travis Koltiska, WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL and SHERIDAN COUNTY SHERIFF, in his official capacity, also known as Levi Dominguez
Encinias v. New Mexico Corrections Department, et al
as 23-2052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRINI ENCINIAS, as personal representative of the Estate of Adonus R. Encinias, deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW MEXICO CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, BEVERLY WOODBURY, TITO VIDAL and others
United States v. Dominguez
as 23-8016
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DOMINGUEZ
Dominguez-Ramos v. Garland
as 23-9519
Petitioner:
ELPIDIO DOMINGUEZ-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
