Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Pablo Dominguez Garcia v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2661
Petitioner:
Pablo Joaquin Dominguez Garcia
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
USA v. Dominguez-Vera
as 6:2023cv03200
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
German Dominguez-Vera
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Radai Mendez Dominguez v. Merrick Garland
as 22-2589
Petitioner:
Radai Obed Mendez Dominguez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Judy Smith-Dandridge v. Jarrett Geanolous, et al
as 21-2459
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Dominguez, Joseph Jennings, John Doe, Defendants 1-6 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Judy Lynn Smith-Dandridge, as Administratrix of the Estate of Andrew Dawson Bell, Deceased
Alberto Hernandez v. William P. Barr
as 20-3575
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
Alberto Dominguez Hernandez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00778
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States v. Sergio Dominguez
as 20-1168
Defendant / Appellant:
Sergio Dominguez, also known as Cesar
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Winston Brakeall v. Leidholt, et al
as 19-3566
Defendant / Appellee:
South Dakota Parole Division, Phil Toft, Lt. Chad Rotert, SD DOC employee employed at SDSP, JPA, and/or Unit C in Sioux Falls, South Dakota; in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Winston Grey Brakeall
Craig Lyons, et al v. Conagra Foods Packaged Foods L
as 17-3134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terry Moore, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Helen Farmer, Nathan Balch, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
