Cases 21 - 30 of 1,026
Thompson et al v. Albany Port District Commission et al
as 1:2023cv01569
Defendant:
National Grid, Albany Port District Commission, Town of Bethlehem Planning Board and others
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Thompson, Valerian Masao, Kerry McCarey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Zepeda-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3906
Petitioner:
LUIS FELIPE ZEPEDA-MARTINEZ, ARLENA SARAHI DOMINGUEZ-FUNEZ and ENOC ZEPEDA-DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dominguez v. Selene Finance, LP
as 3:2023cv06225
Plaintiff:
Rick S Dominguez
Defendant:
Selene Finance, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gonzalez Dominguez v. Garland
as 23-3888
Petitioner:
RAMON GONZALEZ DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dominguez v. Pratt, et al.
as 23-3705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIJAH DOMINGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN PRATT, Chief of Police, DEREK MILLER, Officer, DEREK BUTTS, Deputy District Attorney and others
Davis Jr: Beneficiary v. Saab-Dominguez
as 23-7793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY-EARL DAVIS, JR., Sui Juris In Propia Persona (NATIONAL)
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN SAAB-DOMINGUEZ, And Family, ALEXANDER H. GILLESPIE, And Family, SIBEN & SIBEN, LLP and others
Defendant:
KAREN SAAB-DOINAS, In Her Own Individual Capacity Lawyer
USA v. Dominguez
as 23-50814
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Fernando Nava Dominguez
USA v. Gonzalez-Dominguez
as 23-50795
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Enrique Javier Gonzalez-Dominguez
Raul v. Crane et al
as 1:2023cv14748
Plaintiff:
Pinchas E. Raul
Defendant:
Christopher M. Crane, Joseph Dominguez, Anne R. Pramaggiore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organization Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
