Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02495
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Owen Barnaby v. Mabel Mayfield, et al
as 20-1564
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM B. MURPHY, C.J., The Honorable, ALFRED M. BUTZBAUGH, The Honorable, BERRIEN COUNTY TRIAL COURT, for the State of Michigan and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OWEN W. BARNABY
Dante' Gordon v. Robert Van Schoyck, et al
as 20-3372
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJOR RUBEN QUINTERO, in his individual capacity, GARY C. MOHR, Director, in his individual and official capacity, CAPTAIN UNKNOWN BROWN, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE' D. GORDON
Levoyd Jones v. Vickie Donahue, et al
as 19-3384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVOYD JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
TAGGART BOYD, Deputy Warden of Operation, VICKIE DONAHUE, HCA Overseer of Medical and SCOTT CAMERON, Sergeabt Marrow Units
Logan et al v. Tillerson et al
as 2:2017cv12712
Plaintiff:
Michelle Lynn Logan, Jameel Al Qashtari, Lina Al Qashtari and others
Defendant:
Rex W. Tillerson, U.S. Department of State, Elaine Duke and others
United States of America v. Donahue
as 2:2017mj30350
Defendant:
Derrick Donahue
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Donahue
as 2:2017mj30350
Defendant:
Derrick Donahue
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Donahue v. KC Engdahl, Attorney & Counselor
as 2:2017cv10639
Plaintiff:
Joy Donahue
Defendant:
KC Engdahl, Attorney & Counselor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Hamilton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2016mc00070
Plaintiff:
James D Smith
Defendant:
Hamilton County Sheriff, Greer, Donahue and others
Buchanan v. South Kentucky Welding Supply Company, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv00219
Plaintiff:
Nathan B. Buchanan
Defendant:
South Kentucky Welding Supply Company, Inc. and Donahue Law Group, PSC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
