Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Tucker v. VADOC et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Taiveon Tucker
Defendant:
VADOC, Dunlevy, Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Nelson v. Roanoke City Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Gregory T. Nelson
Defendant:
Roanoke City Jail, Lt. Earls, Sgt. Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donahue v. Unknown
as 7:2023cv00625
Petitioner:
Andrew Donahue
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donahue v. Cumberland County Detention Center
as 5:2023ct03253
Plaintiff:
Brad Donahue
Defendant:
Cumberland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donahue v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Andrew Donahue
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donahue v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2023ct03188
Plaintiff:
Brad Donahue
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poling v. Cumberland County Detention Center
as 5:2023ct03186
Petitioner:
Zachary Nathaniel Poling
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Cumberland County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Charlie Egbert Cain, Brad Donahue, Taimon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Natee v. Donahue et al
as 1:2020cv00440
Respondent:
Chad, J. D. Thorpe, Donahue and others
Petitioner:
Kpaweni M. Natee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
