General Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Donahue Dewar v. Warden Loretto FCI
as 16-1259
Plaintiff - Appellant: DONAHUE DEWAR
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN LORETTO FCI
DEWAR v. MILLION
as 3:2016cv00002
Petitioner: DONAHUE DEWAR
Respondent: SHAWN MILLION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WHERRY v. COLE et al
as 1:2013cv02144
Petitioner: BENJAMIN J. WHERRY, SR.
Respondent: COLE, FCI FORT DIX, DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frank Dippolito v. USA, et al
as 12-4446
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK DIPPOLITO
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
CIRAOLO v. SAMUELS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv07159
Petitioner: EUGENE CIRAOLO
Respondent: CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., J.L. NORWOOD, JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DONAHUE v. SOUDERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02761
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER DONAHUE
Respondent: SOUDERS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Damien Donahue v. J. Grondolsky
as 10-1147
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAMIEN STEPHEN DONAHUE
Defendant - Appellee: J. GRONDOLSKY
DONAHUE v. GRONDOLSKY
as 3:2008cv05560
Petitioner: DAMIEN STEPHEN DONAHUE
Respondent: J. GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DONAHUE v. GRONDOLSKY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv05533
Petitioner: DAMIEN STEPHEN DONAHUE
Respondent: J. GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DONAHUE v. SHULTZ
as 1:2007cv01254
Respondent: SHULTZ
Petitioner: SEAN DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?